Used test: Abarth 124 Spider vs Audi TT Roadster interiors

Interiors

Driving position, visibility, build quality, practicality

You don’t have to look hard to notice plenty of Mazda MX-5 inside the 124. In fact, aside from some Abarth branding and a bit more soft-touch plastic, there’s very little to separate the two cars interiors. And not only are some of the plastics below par, but the absence of reach adjustment for the steering wheel and height adjustment for the driver’s seat also makes it tricky for taller drivers to get comfortable.

Switch to the TT and it feels like you’ve got out of a broom cupboard and into a grand hall. Its interior is much wider and the seats drop much lower, so you feel like you’re sitting in the car, rather than on top of it. There’s a lot more head room with the roof up, too, although the 124’s seats do slide back farther. As for interior quality, the TT is simply in a different league.

In the 124, you get a 7.0in touchscreen that can also be operated via a rotary dial controller. It’s easy to navigate, looks smart and comes with sat-nav as standard. The TT does things differently, with a larger 12.3in screen sitting in place of conventional instruments. The screen resolution is much sharper and the menus are even easier to navigate via Audi’s MMI rotary dial controller. Sat-nav would have cost you extra £1490, though – it was part of a Technology Pack that included Audi Connect internet-based services.

If you’re hoping for a big boot in either car, forget it. The TT’s is more capacious, but it isn’t very tall and getting to the farthest reaches of it can be tricky. It is a fairly uniform shape, though, unlike that of the 124. While smaller in capacity, the 124’s boot is at least taller and easier to access.

<<Previous | Next: How much will they cost to run? >>

Page 2 of 4